Walter Street looking southwest from Climax Street
Allentown Neighborhood
Allentown features a tight grid gently folded over undulating terrain. Densely-packed, modest houses line narrow roads. A resident across from one of the religious sites, who was interested in what I was photographing, shared that her house was built in the 1880s. In those pre-automobile days, residents may have commuted downhill to the industries along the river flats by way of the numerous inclines, one of which used to have a terminus not far from where we were standing and talking.
Three of the jobs I’ve held in my decades of working in Pittsburgh included some element of work in this neighborhood. Much of the neighborhood felt the same as I remembered it from my prior encounters. Long-standing neighborhood restaurants mixed in between vacant storefronts and newer ventures lined the commercial district. Vacant lots and vacant houses sit scattered among the residential blocks. However, I was impressed that some long vacant lots had new infill housing designed for those wanting to age-in-place or people with accessibility needs.
The neighborhood was never targeted for any large-scale Urban Renewal efforts, but individual properties that are vacant, abandoned, or tax delinquent have been demolished from time-to-time. This implies patterns of change, including population loss and disinvestment. The 5 religious sites from 1926 reflect that with each one featuring a unique outcome today: one remains religious, one is now a secular use, one sits vacant, one is a vacant lot, and one is a parking lot.
Neighborhood Statistics (Out of the 70 in this series)
50th largest by acreage
38th highest number of sites (multi-way tie)
18th most sites/acre
Locations
The map below shows the locations of the 5 congregations listed in the 1926 directory for Allentown (the dotted line marks the neighborhood boundary).
What are they now?
The table below matches the 5 congregations listed in the 1926 directory with the current use of the site.
1926 Congregation Name
By 2026 the Congregation’s Building is:
Bethlehem Lutheran Evangelical Church
converted to a community center
First Methodist Episcopal Church
demolished
Progressive Spiritualists Church
replaced with a parking lot
St. George (German) Catholic Church
vacant
Trinity Methodist Episcopal
changed to a different religious institution
Photos
First Methodist Episcopal Church site (2026)
former Bethlehem Lutheran Evangelical Church (2026)
Allegheny West is a neighborhood that features a blend of stability and destruction in its built environment.
Allegheny City’s Millionaires Row once occupied this part of town. It is a dense neighborhood, with a mix of uses. While the houses are frequently attached, many have front porches that provide a buffer from the street. Architectural ornamentation is common and the sidewalks are often paved in brick.
Parts of the neighborhood were impacted by “urban renewal.” The southern portion, between Ridge Avenue and the railroads, was designated as a “renewal” area on behalf of the community college. In 1970, the project was just getting started. It was projected that 10 families and 25 individuals would need to be relocated to make way for the community college campus. A few other areas of the neighborhood north of Ridge Avenue have also seen block-scale demolition and redevelopment into parking lots, warehouses, and a fast food restaurant.
One of the buildings from the congregations listed in the 1926 Polk Directory was lost through these smaller demolition/redevelopments. The other two buildings remain intact with the same congregations.
Neighborhood Statistics (Out of 70 in this Series)
68th largest by acreage
45th highest number of sites (multi-way tie)
16th most sites/acre
Locations
The map below shows the locations of the 3 congregations listed in the 1926 directory for Allegheny West (the dotted line marks the neighborhood boundary).
What are they now?
The table below matches the 3 congregations listed in the 1926 directory with the current use of the site.
Reconstructing a neighborhood that has been almost completely reconfigured is difficult. Pittsburgh’s Allegheny Center neighborhood was once the center of Allegheny City, which was annexed by Pittsburgh in 1907. In the 1800s and first half on the 1900s, the heart of this bustling city was 36 blocks of dense, walkable, mixed-use activity. Most of the buildings and streets of these blocks were erased in the 1960s and 1970s when the City of Pittsburgh and the Urban Redevelopment Authority led a major, federally-funded, “urban renewal” project in the neighborhood. Four existing streets were converted into a one-way ring road, while most of the other streets were erased or converted to pedestrian plazas. The buildings were mostly demolished and replaced by parking lots and mid- to high-rise buildings within the ring road and parking lots and housing complexes outside the ring road.
To facilitate this “renewal,” 376 families, 1161 individuals, and 598 businesses were relocated outside the neighborhood by 1970. Unsurprisingly, given the scope and extent of this displacement in the name of renewal, only one of the buildings used by the 22 congregations listed in the 1926 directory survives. What is surprising is that a former parish house survives, which helped locate the former locations of several of the church buildings that used to sit nearby.
Neighborhood Statistics (Out of the 70 in this series)
64th largest by acreage
4th highest number of religious sites
2nd most sites/acre
Locations
The map below shows the locations of the 22 congregations listed in the 1926 directory for Allegheny Center (the dotted line marks the neighborhood boundary). Note that there are only 20 pins because three congregations apparently shared the same space.
What are they now?
The table below matches the 22 congregations listed in the 1926 directory with the current use of the site.
1926 Congregation Name
By 2026 the Congregation’s Building is:
Arch Street Methodist Episcopal Church
replaced with a parking lot
Central Presbyterian Church
replaced with a community service building
Central Reformed Presbyterian Church
replaced with a housing complex
Christ Episcopal Church
replaced with a community service building
Church of the Soul
replaced with a parking lot
First Protestant Methodist Church
replaced with a housing complex
First United Presbyterian Church
replaced with a parking lot
First Allegheny Christian Church
replaced with a small scale hospital
First Presbyterian Church of Allegheny
replaced with a housing complex
Fourth United Presbyterian Church
replaced with a park (tennis and basketball courts)
Fourth Spiritualists
replaced with a parking lot
Gospel Tabernacle
replaced with a parking lot
Metropolitan Church Mission
replaced with a parking lot
Ohio Street Episcopal Methodist Church
replaced with a housing complex
Pentecostal Mission
replaced with a apartment building
Sandusky Street Baptist Church
replaced with a parking lot
Second United Presbyterian Church
replaced with a commercial building
Spiritualist Church of Truth
replaced with a housing complex
St. Cyprian Catholic Church
replaced with a housing complex
St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church
replaced with a school baseball diamond
St. Peter Catholic Church
still St. Peter Catholic Church
Trinity Lutheran Church
replaced with a commercial building
Photos
Arch Street Methodist Episcopal Church site (2026)
Central Presbyterian Church site (2026)
Central Reformed Presbyterian Church site (2026)
Christ Episcopal Church site (2026)
Church of the Soul site shared with two other congregations (2026)
First Allegheny Christian Church site (2026)
First Presbyterian Church of Allegheny site (2026)
First Protestant Methodist Church of Northside site, adjacent to a Spiritualist site (2026)
First United Presbyterian Church site (2026)
Fourth United Presbyterian Church site (2026)
Gospel Tabernacle site (2026)
Ohio Street Methodist Episcopal Church site (2026)
Pentecostal Mission site (2026)
Sandusky Street Baptist Church site (2026)
Second United Presbyterian Church site (2026)
St. Cyprian Catholic Church site (2026)
St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church site (2026)
In 2010, as I travelled around different neighborhoods in Pittsburgh for work, school, and play, I began to notice a number of former religious buildings that were being used for secular purposes from child care to community centers to homes. Yet, I only heard people talk about one or two that made the news for the controversial way in which they were now used, particularly the brewpub that brewed in the former altar space. This inspired me to try to identify how many former religious buildings in Pittsburgh were being used for secular purposes and what those new uses were. While I have since learned that this is a moving target, I have become more and more fascinated about what these buildings tell us about the history of the city and the people who’ve lived here.
Eventually, I will write a book about Pittsburgh and its communities featuring Pittsburgh’s former religious buildings. In the meantime, I’m broadening the parameters of my research to gather information about former religious buildings that have been demolished or that sit vacant.
Why 1926?
The more I learn about 1926, the more it seems a significant moment in Pittsburgh’s history. It sits in the middle of the city’s final decade of significant population growth, which gets a boost from the numerous boroughs annexed that decade. The city’s boundary in 1926 only encompasses 85% of what will become the city’s full extent after the last annexation in 1955. While the City adopted zoning in 1923 with two types of residential districts (one for single-unit and two-unit dwellings and one for any number of units), in 1926, it added a third type of residential district for only single-unit dwellings.
Granted, given my day job, this last fact may be the reason I’ve become so focused on the year 1926. However, since we are now exactly 100 years later, it seems worth elevating 1926 and 2026 to another “Then & Now” series.
Scope of the Series
Polk’s Pittsburgh City Directory of 1926 identifies over 500 listings under the category “Churches.” Over the next couple of years, this Then & Now series will visit these sites by neighborhood to identify what they look like in 2026. I expect there will be 71 posts in this series occasionally interrupted by other posts, including the monthly public art posts and annual Bridge Madness series.
In 2026, there are 90 neighborhoods officially recognized by Pittsburgh’s Department of City Planning. Only 70 of these will be featured in this series. The others do not have religious sites that are listed in the 1926 city directory. This is because they were were largely undeveloped at that time, not yet annexed to the city, or both (parts of the neighborhood undeveloped and other parts not annexed).
Walking toward the spires in Scranton, PA, I started and ended in Downtown and explored a portion of the Medical and University neighborhoods. Like Pittsburgh and Buffalo, the few religious buildings I found in the heart of downtown remained active. In the adjoining neighborhoods, I found several active religious buildings and others that had been converted to new uses.
Of the 10 total buildings built for religion that I encountered, six remained active while four had been converted to secular uses. One former synagogue is now used for housing. Two former churches are now university buildings. One former church is now a children’s library. This sampling seemed representative enough to contribute to my observations on trends in adaptive reuse and population change. Scranton has experienced a 47% drop in population since its peak population in the 1930s. Based on this information, I expected to find several vacant and reused religious buildings. The surprise finding was that none of them appeared vacant when I got out on the ground.
I also noticed several religious buildings as I drove through the southern neighborhoods on my way home. Because I was driving, I didn’t have the ability to stop and take notes or photos of these buildings, but those that I noticed appeared to be either active religious buildings or active in a secular reuse.
The lack of vacant buildings may perhaps be explained by the recent population trends. While overall, the population is significantly down from the peak, in the last couple decades the decline in population has slowed and the 2020 census showed a miniscule increase in population. It is, so far, the only one of my comparison cities that had a major population drop and a recent increase in population. While Bethlehem and Stroudsburg also saw population increases in the 2020 census, they did not have the same steep drop since the peak population that Scranton and most of the other cities in this survey did.
City
Population Loss Since Peak (Peak Year)
Population Change in 2020
Status of Religious Buildings
Bethlehem
1% (1960)
0.86%
Primarily active sacred uses
Erie
26% (1960)
-6.82%
Primarily active sacred uses
Homestead
85% (1920)
-9.04%
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
Pittsburgh
55% (1950)
-0.96%
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
Scranton
47% (1930)
0.30%
Significant numbers converted to secular uses
Stroudsburg
14% (1950)
6.47%
Primarily active sacred uses
Wilkinsburg
49% (1950)
-10%
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
In addition to the religious and former religious buildings, I found 2 civic buildings and 1 school that sported spires.
Hazelwood is a neighborhood about 4 miles down the Monongahela River from downtown Pittsburgh. It is currently experiencing significant change. Between Hazelwood’s main street (2nd Avenue) and the Monongahela River is a 178-acre site of the former Jones and Laughlin Steel Company. Most of the structures from the mill were demolished, leaving a large brownfield. In 2002, the site was purchased for redevelopment by Almono LP (at the time, an entity made up of four Pittsburgh foundations). After years of planning and a rebranding of the site as Hazelwood Green, a series of public streets and the first building opened for use in 2019. Construction is underway for more buildings and a public plaza.
During the planning and preparation stages, a question arose as to the effects of this redevelopment on the surrounding neighborhood. Hazelwood is one of Pittsburgh’s neighborhoods that has experienced high vacancy rates and subsequent demolition in its residential and business districts. While the building stock of the neighborhood has experienced a long downward trend, the community of people is strong. Only time will tell if the redevelopment of Hazelwood Green will connect with this community or if Hazelwood Green will become and isolated spot of prosperity for others.
Previously, I divided the approach to Keeping an Eye on Hazelwood into three series, Keeping an Eye on Hazelwood Green, Keeping an Eye on Hazelwood Flats, and Keeping an Eye on Hazelwood Slope. For this post and the 2023 post, I will be combining these into a single series. The goal of this series is to periodically document the physical changes to the former steel mill site and to the surrounding neighborhood.
The Photos
Due to a full schedule in 2022, I was not able to take any photographs of the neighborhood this year.
Hazelwood in the News
The big news of 2022 was the announcement of the plan for the current nonprofit owner (Almono LP) of Hazelwood Green to turn over management and eventually ownership of the site to a New York-based, for-profit development firm. (Pittsburgh Business Times, February 25, 2022, article 1 and article 2)
At the end of 2021, the plan and zoning regulations governing the redevelopment of Hazelwood Green was amended to respond to the current market. One of the changes was to allow more flexibility for temporary parking lots that the Planning Commission placed a condition that such parking lots must expire after 40 years. (Planning Commission agenda, Planning Commission minutes, City Council legislation page)
Public Source (October 27, 2021) discussed this amendment as well as community efforts to bring a grocery store to the neighborhood, to establish and maintain affordable housing, and to maintain and strengthen the ecosystem created by the greenway on the hill overlooking Hazelwood Green.
Also, toward the end of 2021, the One Valley innovation hub moved into the renovated Roundhouse (LinkedIn, July 20, 2021) and the University of Pittsburgh announced plans to build BioForge, a biomanufacturing facility, with funds from the Richard King Mellon Foundation (Pittsburgh Business Times, November 17, 2021, articles on funding and Pitt’s plans)
The City of Pittsburgh has a project page to track the restoration of the Hazelwood Greenway.
Uptown is one of the many neighborhoods in Pittsburgh that experienced decades of neglect. For this neighborhood, the neglect was despite Uptown being sandwiched between Oakland and downtown, two places among the state’s strongest economic regions. Zipping through Uptown from Oakland to downtown on Fifth Avenue or from downtown to Oakland on Forbes Avenue, it is easy to overlook or dismiss the hodgepodge of ruined home foundations turning back to forest; scattered vacant lots, parking lots, and industrial uses; and the intricate architectural details on abandoned and renovated townhomes.
In recent years, new buildings started springing up here and there. Some of these new projects are the work of the two institutions in the neighborhood: UPMC Mercy Hospital and Duquesne University. Others are the work of a variety of commercial and residential developers. Two reasons for this recent investment are the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system, which will eventually run through the neighborhood, and the in-progress redevelopment of the Lower Hill, an adjacent neighborhood.
The Uptown community saw these changes coming and prepared. Between 2015 and 2017, the community organization Uptown Partners collaborated UPMC Mercy, Duquesne University, the City of Pittsburgh, and others to create the EcoInnovation District Plan and the Uptown Public Realm zoning district. The plan and new zoning district are intended to guide future development and leverage their economic investment for the greater good of the neighborhood. Ideally, this will reduce the number of those who will be left behind.
This blog post is part of an on-going series watching the changes in Uptown. Periodically, approximately once a year, I return to the neighborhood to take new photographs of the same areas. In addition, I include links to articles about the project that I’ve encountered since the previous post in the series. At the end of the post, there is a map showing the location of the neighborhood and links to the previous posts in the series.
What’s new
There’s been a lot of development in Uptown since the last on-the-ground photographs from December 2021. Several projects that were in progress at that time have since been completed (or at least appear completed) including the UPMC Mercy Pavilion for the new vision rehabilitation center. Many more projects have broken ground, including one near the Birmingham Bridge on a vacant lot that has an extreme grade change. The near cliff that ran through the middle of this site made me guess that it would take longer to develop that property than the vacant building across the street with the Burrell sign painted on the side. This suggests that it may be easier to develop a environmentally challenged site than to reuse an existing building – which is a disturbing thought.
In addition to the projects we can see developing in the photo series, several more have been announced for the neighborhood, which can be seen in the news section.
A small aside, as a picture tells a 1,000 words, the photo this year of the Shephard’s Heart Fellowship suggests an unfortunate story (slightly embellished from having ridden the bus past the building over the course of several months). While there is no good time to have a fire, it appears that Shephard’s Heart had a fire shortly after they finished putting a fresh coat of paint on their building. As it’s been at least four months since I first notice the damage and no exterior repairs are apparent, it seems they might be having difficulty in resolving the after affects.
The Photos
Uptown in the News & on the Web
Two projects in Uptown are listed in Next Pittsburgh‘s list of 8 major development projects to watch in 2023: UPMC Mercy’s Vision Rehabilitation Center and Duquesne University’s new 12-story student housing (January 11, 2023). The Pittsburgh Business Times got a first look at the new UPMC Mercy Pavilion – the home of the vision rehabilitation center – prior to its May 1 opening (April 19, 2023) and the University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences provided an description of the services that will be provided (May 10, 2023).
The Tito-Mecca-Zazza House continued to make the news. The developer and Uptown Partners reached an agreement that would donate the house to the nonprofit for restoration while the new construction multi-unit building would be built on the remaining parcels, including the one with the garage that is part of Rolling Rock’s origin story (Pittsburgh Business Times, July 21, 2023). A descendant of the Tito family has filed a lawsuit protesting the proposed demolition of the garage (Pittsburgh Business Times, August 28, 2023).
The Bethlehem Haven women’s shelter in Uptown sought and received approval from Planning Commission on its plans to renovate and expand (Public Source, April 4, 2023; TribLIVE, April 4, 2023; TribLIVE, April 19, 2023).
Several other housing projects received approvals or are moving forward in the neighborhood including:
a formerly stalled 110-unit mixed-use apartment building got an infusion of new funds from the URA (Pittsburgh Business Times, January 19, 2023)
a 240-unit apartment building proposed for a block that is primarily a parking lot today (Pittsburgh Business Times, February 21, 2023)
an affordable/workforce housing development that received approval from Planning Commission (Public Source, July 25, 2023)
Panelists were interviewed by the Pittsburgh Business Times prior to their talk about the projects and opportunities coming to Uptown and the Lower Hill and another Pittsburgh Business Times article focused on the prominent role of Black developers in these projects (both articles: June 8, 2023). Another article discusses the panel (Pittsburgh Business Times, June 13, 2023).
Tech companies are also interested in Uptown with a tech venture studio taking over part of the former Paramount Building in Uptown (Pittsburgh Business Times, March 31, 2023).
Uptown is one of the many neighborhoods in Pittsburgh that experienced decades of neglect. For this neighborhood, the neglect was despite Uptown being sandwiched between Oakland and downtown, two places among the state’s strongest economic regions. Zipping through Uptown from Oakland to downtown on Fifth Avenue or from downtown to Oakland on Forbes Avenue, it is easy to overlook or dismiss the hodgepodge of ruined home foundations turning back to forest; scattered vacant lots, parking lots, and industrial uses; and the intricate architectural details on abandoned and renovated townhomes.
In recent years, new buildings started springing up here and there. Some of these new projects are the work of the two institutions in the neighborhood: UPMC Mercy Hospital and Duquesne University. Others are the work of a variety of commercial and residential developers. Two reasons for this recent investment are the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system, which will eventually run through the neighborhood, and the in-progress redevelopment of the Lower Hill, an adjacent neighborhood.
The Uptown community saw these changes coming and prepared. Between 2015 and 2017, the community organization Uptown Partners collaborated UPMC Mercy, Duquesne University, the City of Pittsburgh, and others to create the EcoInnovation District Plan and the Uptown Public Realm zoning district. The plan and new zoning district are intended to guide future development and leverage their economic investment for the greater good of the neighborhood. Ideally, this will reduce the number of those who will be left behind.
This blog post is part of an on-going series watching the changes in Uptown. Periodically, approximately once a year, I return to the neighborhood to take new photographs of the same areas. In addition, I include links to articles about the project that I’ve encountered since the previous post in the series. At the end of the post, there is a map showing the location of the neighborhood and links to the previous posts in the series.
What’s new
The big news of 2022 was the successful nomination of the Tito-Mecca-Zizza House for historic preservation. Despite a rocky road, in June, City Council voted to designate the house as a historic property. The property owners were vehemently opposed to the nomination throughout the process. The process to nomination involved two meetings at each of the Historic Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council. The Historic Commission did not recommend the nomination to City Council, but the Planning Commission did. The property is considered architectural significant and unique and it has ties to Rolling Rock beer, the Negro League, and the American-Italian community of Pittsburgh. I attended a pop-museum event at the site during the nomination process and include photos below.
While this house is clearly unique – long before I knew its history, it had caught my eye as something completely different from its surroundings – I did not include it in the photographs I’ve been taking of the neighborhood in the this series. This is a clear illustration of one of the challenges of Keeping an Eye on a neighborhood – predicting which portions are going to be most illustrative of changes over time. Unfortunately, I was not able to get out in the neighborhood for the usual photos this year, though I do have a few bird’s eye view photos to share.
A developer proposed a project on 1.8 acres including the Tito House site that would be a new construction mixed-use project including 260 apartments (Pittsburgh Business Times, February 11, 2022) and another developer proposed a 51-unit building at the western end of the neighborhood (Pittsburgh Business Times, December 9, 2022)
One of the key ingredients for the stability component of “home” is safety. In the aftermath of 9/11, there was a concern about the safety of living in cities and living in New York in particular. The Pennsylvania boroughs of Stroudsburg and East Stroudsburg were among the places considered safe by those leaving New York City. Knowing this going in and comparing it to the lessons learned from Bethlehem, I assumed that the religious buildings would reflect a sense of stability.
Of the two boroughs, Stroudsburg has a more centralized concentration of religious buildings that was easy for me to explore on foot within the limitations of my post-injury recovery phase. The results of this survey confirmed my hypothesis. Of the seven buildings I found, only one was converted to a secular use. Another one appeared to be having a renovation of it’s primary entrance but was still looked actively used as a church. (Facebook confirmed that it is still active with a video of the Polish language mass from a few days before the date I looked it up.) A third building was a storefront that is a First Church of Christ, Scientist.
Comparing Stroudsburg with other Pennsylvania towns where I’ve explored the status of religious buildings, it fits the pattern well. Stroudsburg’s peak population was in 1950, the same as Pittsburgh and Wilkinsburg. Below is an updated chart of the population loss for these cities and a broad impression of the state of their religious buildings.
City
Population Loss Since Peak (Peak Year)
Status of Religious Buildings
Bethlehem
1% (1960)
Primarily active sacred uses
Erie
26% (1960)
Primarily active sacred uses
Homestead
85% (1920)
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
Pittsburgh
55% (1950)
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
Stroudsburg
14% (1950)
Primarily active sacred uses
Wilkinsburg
49% (1950)
Significant numbers closed or converted to secular uses
Uptown is one of the many neighborhoods in Pittsburgh that experienced decades of neglect. For this neighborhood, the neglect was despite Uptown being sandwiched between Oakland and downtown, two places among the state’s strongest economic regions. Zipping through Uptown from Oakland to downtown on Fifth Avenue or from downtown to Oakland on Forbes Avenue, it is easy to overlook or dismiss the hodgepodge of ruined home foundations turning back to forest; scattered vacant lots, parking lots, and industrial uses; and the intricate architectural details on abandoned and renovated townhomes.
In recent years, new buildings started springing up here and there. Some of these new projects are the work of the two institutions in the neighborhood: UPMC Mercy Hospital and Duquesne University. Others are the work of a variety of commercial and residential developers. Two reasons for this recent investment are the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system, which will eventually run through the neighborhood, and the in-progress redevelopment of the Lower Hill, an adjacent neighborhood.
The Uptown community saw these changes coming and prepared. Between 2015 and 2017, the community organization Uptown Partners collaborated UPMC Mercy, Duquesne University, the City of Pittsburgh, and others to create the EcoInnovation District Plan and the Uptown Public Realm zoning district. The plan and new zoning district are intended to guide future development and leverage their economic investment for the greater good of the neighborhood. Ideally, this will reduce the number of those who will be left behind.
This blog post is part of an on-going series watching the changes in Uptown. Periodically, once or twice a year, I return to the neighborhood to take new photographs of the same areas. In addition, I include links to articles about the project that I’ve encountered since the previous post in the series. At the end of the post, there is a map showing the location of the neighborhood and links to the previous posts in the series.
What’s new
Since the last walk through the neighborhood, several buildings have been demolished while those that have been under construction continue to make progress. Progress also continues on a handful of housing renovations in the neighborhood.
The roads and sidewalks were even more rough and patched from the utility line replacements started this spring. According to a recent press release from the Mayor’s office, this utility work will continue next year, so a temporary repaving will be happening shortly to smooth out the roads for the winter season.
While I believe that this utility work is part of the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority’s lead line replacement project, there were new signs up in the neighborhood apologizing for the mess as the neighborhood prepares for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). The utility replacement mess has happened in various neighborhoods throughout the city including those that are not part of the BRT routes. However, there was no other obvious mess, yet, that would be more directly associated with the construction of a BRT and need signs of apology.
The Photos
Uptown in the News & on the Web:
The pending Fifth and Dinwiddie development (image 8 above) proposes to be Passive House certified, include double the number of affordable housing units required by the URA as a condition of sale, and provide training on clean energy jobs. (September 20, 2021: NextPittsburgh)
UPMC’s Vision and Rehabilitation Center (images 19, 9, 12 above) is on track to open in 2023 despite construction disruptions, supply shortages, and the pressure placed on existing healthcare systems by COVID. (November 16, 2021: Pittsburgh Business Times, Tribune Review)
urbantraipsing 