Tag Archives: Hill District

Then & Now 1926-2026: Bedford Dwellings Religious Buildings

Posted on by
Bedford Avenue looking northeast.1

Bedford Dwellings Neighborhood

One of the five neighborhoods collectively known as The Hill District, Bedford Dwellings is a neighborhood named after a public housing project from the 1930s & 1940s. It is a strip of land, a block wide for most of its length, situated between Bedford Avenue and the cliff that overlooks the Strip District and Allegheny River. While no redevelopment projects were undertaken in this neighborhood during the official “Urban Renewal” era (approximately 1949-1970s) per the City’s 1970 report, the neighborhood has been erased and redeveloped multiple times in the last 100 years.

The 1923 G. M. Hopkins map shows a mix of uses along this 1-mile section of Bedford Avenue. There are blocks of small lots partially built out with homes, the Lincoln Memorial Cemetery, the Entress Brick Company and a few other small businesses, the Municipal Hospital, and the Tuberculosis League Hospital.

By April 1932, Entress Brick Company is replaced with Greenlee Field, the first baseball park built by a Black businessman. “At Forbes Field, Yankee Stadium, and every other major league stadium where Negroes played, they weren’t allowed to use the locker facilities. But tonight [opening night] the men of the [Pittsburgh] Crawfords and the Black Yankees didn’t have to change at a boardinghouse or on a bus. Tonight, thanks to Gus Greenlee, they slipped out of their sweaty uniforms and muddy cleats in the dignity of their own locker room.”2

Unfortunately, the city had a different vision for the use of the land and Greenlee Field closed after only 4 years. The “Housing Authority offered Greenless $38,000 for the land and threatened to seize it if he didn’t take the deal.”3 The Housing Authority then built its first public housing development.

Today, as the Housing Authority works to replace their 20th-Century housing units with 21st-Century housing units across the city, some parts of the Bedford Dwellings neighborhood have been redeveloped, again, using HUD HOPE grants and others are slated for their next redevelopment project funded by the federal Choice Neighborhoods grant program.

The two religious sites listed in the 1926 city directory were located near the part of the neighborhood most built out with housing per the 1923 G. M. Hopkins maps. One likely succumbed to the same project that erased Greenlee Field; the other survived and today shows a strong presence both in the church building and in nearby properties.

Neighborhood Statistics (Out of 70 in this Series)

  • 67th largest by acreage
  • 53rd highest number of sites (multi-way tie)
  • 32nd most sites/acre

Locations

The map below shows the locations of the 2 congregations listed in the 1926 directory for Bedford Dwellings (the dotted line marks the neighborhood boundary).

What are they now?

The table below matches the 2 congregations listed in the 1926 directory with the current use of the site.

1926 Congregation NameBy 2026 the Congregation’s Building is:
Macedonia Baptist Churchstill Macedonia Baptist Church
New Light Baptist Churchreplaced with a community baseball diamond

Photos

  • Macedonia Baptist Church 2026
  • New Light Baptist Church site 2026

Footnotes

  1. On left: beginnings of the demolition of the 1938 Bedford Dwellings public housing;
    Center: the 2000s community center from the HUD HOPE VI grant redevelopment;
    On right: rowhouses in the Middle Hill neighborhood that illustrate what the housing pre-1938 in Bedford Dwellings neighborhood might have looked like. ↩︎
  2. Whitaker, 90-91 ↩︎
  3. Whitaker, 121 ↩︎

For more on this series, visit our introductory post.

Sources:

G. M. Hopkins & Co. Bedford Dwellings. Plate 30A. 1923. https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt%3A23v0130a

G. M. Hopkins & Co. Crawford-Roberts. Plate 11B. 1923. https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt%3A23v0111b

G. M. Hopkins & Co. Middle Hill. Plate 29A. 1923. https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt:23v0129a

Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh. A Report to the People: Public Housing in Pittsburgh, 1938-1953. Pittsburgh, 1953. https://pittsburgharchives.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_b74e0198-8ee1-4b50-93d6-b631adc3dc44/

Housing Authority City of Pittsburgh. Bedford Dwellings Redevelopment Planning. https://hacp.org/bedfordconnects/

Pittsburgh Department of City Planning. A Community Profile of Bedford Dwellings. 1974. https://historicpittsburgh.org/islandora/object/pitt%3A31735070065887

Pittsburgh Department of City Planning. A Development and Renewal Program for Pittsburgh, Summary Documentation, Pittsburgh Community Renewal Program. Pittsburgh, 1970. https://pittsburgharchives.access.preservica.com/uncategorized/IO_d1f07da0-9303-4aee-a162-04c83a0eaaa0/

Polk’s Pittsburgh City Directory, 1926. Pittsburgh: R. L. Polk & Co. https://digital.library.pitt.edu/islandora/object/pitt%3A31735056286846/viewer#page/4/mode/1up

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. “HUD Secretary Ben Carson Designates the Bedford Hope Center as New EnVision Center.” October 16, 2020. https://archives.hud.gov/news/2020/pr20-174.cfm?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Whitaker, Mark. The Untold Story of Smoketown: The Other Great Black Renaissance. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2018.

Oakland Bridges: The Hollows

Posted on by

Oakland is a cluster of Pittsburgh neighborhoods east of downtown. It has the highest concentration of institutions and cultural amenities in the city. It is home to Carlow College, the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt), Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), multiple UPMC hospitals, the Phipps Conservatory (Phipps), Schenley Park (the second largest city park), and the Carnegie Institute complex (housing the Carnegie Museums of Art and Natural History, the main Carnegie Library, and the Carnegie Music Hall). Most of these as well as much of the commercial and residential parts of Oakland were built on a shelf. The hospitals, part of Pitt, and some houses climb the slope toward the Hill District. Some houses also spill over the edge of the shelf, down into the hollows.

Several bridges span the Junction and Panther hollows in Oakland. The Forbes Avenue bridge connects CMU to the Carnegie Institute complex and one of the commercial districts. The Schenley Bridge connects Pitt and the Carnegie Institute complex to the Phipps and Schenley Park. The Panther Hollow Bridge spans a second hollow to connect the Phipps with the rest of Schenley Park. The Charles Anderson Memorial Bridge carries the Blvd of the Allies over Junction Hollow. A fifth bridge without pedestrian access carries 376 over the hollow. This bridge can be partially glimpsed from the Anderson Bridge, but its presence can be clearly marked by the traffic’s rushing whoosh that carries up the hollow.

By the Forbes Ave and Schenley bridges, Junction Hollow has an industrial feel. The railroad is mostly exposed at these points (further down it is surrounded by trees, shrubs, and other overgrowth). There are also several parking lots and CMU houses some of its facilities functions along the hollow. By the Schenley Bridge, a massive electrical substation was recently constructed across from the historic (and active) steam factory.

The Panther Hollow Bridge provides a completely different feel as its hollow is 100% park. It is the only one of these bridges that does not cross over the railroad and is therefore the only one without a cage. A small lake with walking trail is visible on one side (with the railroad beyond a row of weeds). The other side overlooks a forested hillside and valley floor. Hawks and/or falcons can often be seen gliding over this hollow.

The Anderson Bridge overlooks Junction Hollow at its most parklike point, but it has a less peaceful feel than the Panther Bridge. A combination of the almost-highway Blvd of the Allies, the bridge’s height above the hollow, and its pedestrian fence make the bridge feel isolated from nature when walking across.

Street Trees: Alive or Dead

Posted on by

Street trees have a tough life. Between extensive pruning away from power, cable, and internet lines, baking in the radiant heat from the surrounding pavement, and (in winter climates) runoff from salt or sand, it is amazing any survive. Yet in some neighborhoods street trees are thriving while in others they are non-existent or barely hanging on.

Street trees first appeared in US cities in the 1840s and 1850s as part of a growing interest in landscape architecture. However, they soon encountered challenges. Fire insurance companies banned street trees in towns that relied on bucket brigades as the trees helped spread fires that decimated swaths of towns. Then, the street trees worst nemesis arrived – the overhead lines. First telephone companies then power companies pruned trees away from their lines. John R. Stilgoe in Outside Lies Magic notes that the resultant loss of street trees created a “nationwide uproar” by 1920. One hundred years later, this conflict between wires and trees is still unresolved.

As I traveled around Pittsburgh this spring and summer, I noticed that some neighborhoods seem to have found a way to maintain both old, large canopy street trees and overhead lines. Other neighborhoods appear to struggle to establish and maintain even understory or decorative trees. The pattern of where street trees are thriving versus where they aren’t appears to match the wealth of the neighborhood.

I first noticed this pattern as a child, though I couldn’t articulate it as such at the time. The Pennsylvania town where I partially grew up had a Green Street. The name made a strong impression on me at the time because half of Green Street was very aptly named. It had the oldest and thickest street tree canopy in town. The other half of the street, as I remember it, did not have a single street tree (or yard tree). This dichotomy fascinated me as a child.

Now, looking back on this memory with my urbanist eyes, it seems the perfect example of the correlation between wealth and street trees. The half of Green Street with the street trees was predominantly detached, single-family dwellings with large front, side, and rear yards. The half of Green Street without street trees was predominantly attached homes, possibly with some duplexes, and shallower front yards.

In Pittsburgh, the division is by neighborhood, not block. Neighborhoods like Squirrel Hill, Point Breeze, and Shadyside, which used to contain most of the city’s millionaires rows and continue to have housing values 3-4 times the city’s average, have old, well-established street trees that are somehow able to grow around the overhead lines. Neighborhoods like Homewood and the Hill District, which were victimized by Urban Renewal policies in the ‘50s and ‘60s and now have housing values two-thirds the city’s average, have few street trees, most of which were planted within the last ten years.